Question: Should I Use Hooks Or Redux?

Is Redux worth learning?

Yes, you should learn Redux.

Regardless of the flak it gets, it’s still the most popular state management library for React apps.

It’s battle tested, has incredible tooling, and there’s a large community around it.

If you’ve got a question, someone’s already answered it..

Is Redux overkill?

Managing everything in Redux is overkill. It may have negative performance implications, it will increase the complexity of your app, make it hard to refactor, and likely reduce the reusability of many of your components. … Technically speaking, people were build big fancy complex React apps before Redux came along.

Why do hooks react?

What are Hooks? … If the React community embraces [hooks], it will reduce the number of concepts you need to juggle when writing React applications. Hooks let you always use functions instead of having to constantly switch between functions, classes, higher-order components, and render props.

Does Redux use context?

As our application grows, this problem also grows. There are strategies around this, which we will get more into later, but this is why React-Redux does not use context to update its components.

Should I use Redux or context API?

Redux is for managing the state of the application, Context is for passing props. On the face of it, there is no conflict. If you ask literally what to choose, Context or Redux — the answer is RTFM. But we all know that the real question is hidden in the context (🙃).

Is Redux difficult?

I have Angular background too and when I started learning Redux, I found it is very complicated and hard to understand Redux. It requires a different thinking model than Angular. … Get familiar with redux-thunk and async action creator in Redux. I suggest that you should implement the Reddit client.

Is Redux obsolete?

Where your state is managed is a crucial difference between Redux and useReducer. … However, even though we are able to lift all the useReducer state up to our most top-level component — almost making Redux obsolete because it can be seen as global state container — it still isn’t one global state container.

Do hooks replace redux?

TL;DR The useReducer React hook provides a Redux-like means of managing state transitions, but it’s no replacement for Redux when it comes to managing a global application state tree. … Even better, hooks can be composed into larger units of functionality that can be mixed into any number of components.

Is Redux still relevant 2019?

Yes, Redux is still popular. … Redux is a way for an app to manage complex states. In React, components have their own state, but they don’t have an easy way to access another components’ state (by design).

Why you should not use Redux?

This makes your code easier to test and it makes application state easier to reason about. A goal of redux is also to be a convention, not a library. So redux is plain Javascript and you don’t need any dependencies to use it (although many will probably use the react-redux bindings).

Why react hooks is better than redux?

If you’re thinking about building an application, both can be used. While Redux holds the global state and actions that can be dispatched, the React Hooks features to handle the local component state.

Redux has become the popular state management solution for most applications using React, Vue, or Angular as front-end frameworks. One of the main reasons for the popularity of Redux is its lightweight size of a mere 2KB. … The main building blocks of Redux are its actions, reducers, and store.

Is Redux frontend or backend?

Redux is the Pivotal Frontend Innovation.

When should I use Redux?

In general, use Redux when you have reasonable amounts of data changing over time, you need a single source of truth, and you find that approaches like keeping everything in a top-level React component’s state are no longer sufficient. However, it’s also important to understand that using Redux comes with tradeoffs.

Does Facebook use Redux?

Dan Abramov on Twitter: “Actually Facebook doesn’t use Redux “at scale”, it uses Flux :-)… ”